Posts Tagged With: John Rosemond

Bringing Up Bébé | Vive’ la France!

Vive’ la France!

Last year, a Chinese-American Tiger Mother told American parents how to raise children who will make straight A’s and play Carnegie Hall before they reach puberty.

This year, the French are showing us how to raise children who will obey, throw few if any tantrums, and sit quietly in restaurants, listening while adults talk about adult things. Vive’ la France!

In a nutshell, French parents do such “revolutionary” things as establish early boundaries between themselves and their children, teach them proper manners, expect them to entertain themselves, and make it perfectly clear that they are not to interrupt adult conversations, and set clear limits. In addition, they are not reluctant to deny their children’s requests, and when they correct their kids, they speak with conviction. I conclude that my parents were French. All my friend’s parents were French as well, it seems.

Pamela Druckerman, the author of “Bringing Up Bebe,” one of the year’s most talked-about books (to date), is too young to realize that her description of French parenting is also a description of the manner in which American children were raised prior to the psychological parenting revolution of the late 1960s and early 1970s—before, that is, experts (of which I am considered one) came along and ruined everything. In that regard, it is significant to note that French parents, as a rule, do not read parenting books. Instead, they honor the parenting traditions established generations ago by their foremothers and forefathers.

As a consequence, raising a child in 2012 France is no more of a hassle than was raising a child in 1912 France…or before. For more than 30 years, I have been trying to persuade America’s parents to restore pre-1960s parenting in their homes—that being the time when chores were a child’s number one after-school activity, television was a “boob tube” only to be watched if the weather did not permit outside play, parents did not help with homework (and kids did better in school than today’s kids), and children did what they were told simply because that was the clear expectation.

The most oft-voiced retort: “But John! Times have changed!”

To which I point out that times have always changed, but parenting did not—not until experts said it should, that is (they had new ideas!).

Contrary to what American parents have been led to believe, effective parenting is not comprised of a set of “right” methods (which can only be learned by reading the experts). It is an attitude, a way of presenting oneself to one’s children. If the attitude isn’t there, then no method will work for long. Furthermore, when it is there, methods will be virtually unnecessary.

This attitude communicates to a child: “I know what I am doing (I do not need, for example, to consult with you to determine foods will be on your plate at the evening meal); I know why I am doing it (for YOUR benefit, not mine); I know what I expect from you; and I know you are going to give me what I expect.” This attitude conveys unconditional love and, equally, unequivocal authority.

Anxiety, worry, guilt, rushing from one “commitment” to another: none of that conveys authority. Cool, calm, collected: that conveys authority. Pleading, bribing, threatening, yelling: nope. An economy of words, clearly spoken: yep.

From Ms. Druckerman’s description, it sounds like the typical French parent has an intuitive understanding of this “attitude thing.”But make no mistake: the French did not invent this. They have simply reminded us of the way it was and still can be.

Now, if they would only build a decent car.

.by John Rosemond

Continued on rosemond.com

http://www.rosemond.com/johns-columns/february-columns/

Categories: Inspiration, quotes, Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Read to your young children

We have read John Rosemond for years. His common sense approach is one more parents should embrace. I highly recommend his books, and also suggest you check out research psychologist Jane Healy‘s book Endangered Minds. - billydie

http://www.rosemondquestions.com/?page_id=2

June 14 Column:Readingto young children

-JohnRosemond

Q:    In your book on 2-year-olds, you recommend reading to a child from early on. My problem is that every time I attempt to read to my 16-month-old son he grabs the book away, closes it, or wants to flip the pages himself. If I try to take it back from him, the battle is on, one that I do not wish to engage in. I am an avid reader, and I had hoped to instill a love of reading in him as well. I certainly don’t want to make reading an unpleasant experience for him. I’m sure there is a very commonsense solution that I am simply missing, and I hope you will enlighten me.

A:    I have consulted the oracles of commonsense and they recommend that you simply wait until your son is older and try again. Yes, reading to a child from as early as possible is beneficial in many ways. It stimulates a child’s interest in books, enriches imagination, enhances language development, provides a setting for a very nurturing parent-child experience, and stimulates the growing brain. I don’t know of any studies demonstrating that reading to a child increases IQ (it would be difficult to impossible to isolate that one variable), but it seems logical to me that it would.

So yes, I recommend that parents read to children from an early age.

Along with that, I recommend (based on a solid body of research) that preschool children watch absolutely zero television (research psychologist Jane Healy, author of Endangered Minds, recommends that children remain TV-free well into elementary school) and have absolutely no interaction with video games and computers.Readingto a preschooler and then letting him watch television (or play video games) is akin to taking one developmental step forward and then one developmental step backward.

But my entire recommendation reads as follows: Parents should read to a child from an early age as long as the child is willing to sit still and pay attention, obviously wants to be read to (goes and gets books and asks a parent to read to him), and the experience is enjoyable for both parent and child. If all those conditions are not yet in place by 16 months, there is absolutely nothing to worry about. Just keep offering the opportunity to your son. Don’t push. And stop worrying. Believe me, if he’s not receptive to the experience for another year that will not make any difference in the long run.

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , , | Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Adventure Journal by Contexture International.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers